Aquaculture for all
Finally a tariff you’ll enjoy: Get 30% off all yearly membership plans by entering code TFS30 at checkout.

Global Shrimp Forum 2025How can the shrimp sector secure more funding?

Shrimp Disease Investment +2 more

Shrimp farmers still face steep barriers to attracting serious investment, largely due to the volatile and fragmentary nature of production, but that there might be ways to make themselves more appealing, according to a panel of investors at this year’ Global Shrimp Forum.

by Senior editor, The Fish Site
Rob Fletcher thumbnail
A panel discussion.
Left to right: Pies Lakin, Marcel Smits, Jeroen van der Staay and Gorjan Nikolik

The risks of disease outbreaks and production inconsistency are two of the key deterrents to investment, according to Piers Lakin, a fund manager at Ocean 14 Capital. While his fund has invested in a shrimp genetics company, SyAqua, they have been less willing to invest in shrimp producers themselves.

“Production in the shrimp industry was a difficult place for us to invest due to fragmentation and the volatility and the commoditised nature that you had to deal with at the production level,” he explained. 

The fund has also invested in Aqua Exchange. 

“We decided to focus on technologies which could combine together to really drive value in the industry, both in terms of sustainability, but really resource efficiency, longevity and stability,” he said.

From a banking perspective, disease mitigation is the defining challenge. 

As Jeroen van der Staay, executive director of Rabo Ventures, emphasised: “The main issue with shrimp particularly is disease, much more so than any of the other species that are being grown at scale.”

As a result, Rabobank chose to back ViAqua, which is developing an RNA-based feed to combat viral infections in shrimp. Though the bet was considered high risk, van der Staay admitted, the potential impact justified it.

“Because of the potential impact it could have on the industry…Rabobank did decide to take basically a chance on this company,” he said.

Both Rabobank and Ocean 14 Capital highlighted a central issue: farming risk is simply higher in shrimp compared to other aquaculture species. While they both invested in the Kingfish Company, they said that land-based kingfish farms, while expensive, offer higher-value products and clearer paths to market. Shrimp farms, in contrast, struggle to deliver the industrial scale and predictability that institutional investors require.

As Marcel Smits, director of SF Investment Management Company summarised, “The problem, of course, with disease is that it makes it unstable…for VC and especially for PE, it’s very hard.”

Beyond solving disease and volatility, Smits pointed to the long-term opportunity presented by the differentiation of shrimp products, and the possibility of moving away from commodity shrimp production. 

“What I’m quite passionate about is premiumisation of the top end of the market… a premium segment is small in volume, it’s bigger in value, it is much bigger in share of voice and it leads the education of the consumer,” he noted. 

According to Smits, a growing emphasis by key shrimp producers on sustainability and transparency could help shrimp replicate the trajectory of cage-free eggs, where a premium offering eventually transformed mainstream markets.

Series: Global Shrimp Forum 2025

How do Mexico's and Brazil's shrimp sectors compare?

While both Mexico and Brazil’s shrimp sectors are heavily reliant on domestic consumption the former is in the process of gradual technological adoption, twinned with consolidation of production, while the latter is focused on scaling production and democratis…