Aquaculture for all

Comparative Evaluation for Dietary Inclusion of Some Medicinal Plants in Carp

Nutrition Health Husbandry +4 more

In a 12-week indoor feeding trial by A. M. Abdelhamid, Al-Mansourah University and A. A. Soliman, Egypt National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, common carp fry were fed dietary graded levels (0, 1, and 2 per cent) of various medicinal plants to see what affect they have on the performance and composition of fish.

Lucy Towers thumbnail

Mentha arvensis leaves meal (MALM, T1), Camellia sinesis leaves meal (CSLM, T2), Marticaria chmomilla meal (MCM, T3), Origanum majorana leaves meal (MOLM, T4), Zingiber officinale meal (ZOM, T5), and Cinnamum zeylanicum meal (CZM, T6) were tested for their effects on fish performance and composition.

The obtained results of T1 confirmed the significant gradual (with increasing the feed additive level) improvements in fish final weight (FW), weight gain [total (AWG) and daily (ADG)], growth rates [relative (RGR) and specific (SGR)], feed utilization [feed (FI) and protein intakes (PI)], feed conversion (FCR), protein productive value (PPV), protein efficiency ratio (PER), energy retention (ER) ] by increasing the dietary level of MALM. This feed additive, also, significantly improved fish carcass composition (protein, ether extract, and energy content). So, it could recommend the dietary inclusion of 1 per cent MALM to common carp fish fry.

The obtained results of T2 confirmed the significant gradual (with increasing the feed additive level) improvements in fish performance and feed and nutrients utilization parameters by increasing level of CSLM. This feed additive, also, significantly improved fish carcass composition. So, it could recommend the dietary inclusion of 1 per cent CSLM or green tea tree leaves meal to common carp fish fry.

The T3 results confirmed the significant gradually (with increasing the feed additive level) improvements in fish performance and feed and nutrients utilization parameters by increasing MCM level. This feed additive, also, significantly improved fish carcass composition. So, it could recommend the dietary inclusion of 2 per cent MCM to common carp fish fry.

The obtained results of T4 (MOLM) confirmed the significant gradual (with increasing the feed additive level) improvements in fish performance and feed and nutrients utilization parameters by increasing the level of MOLM. This feed additive, also, significantly improved fish carcass composition. So, it could recommend the dietary inclusion of 1 per cent MOLM to common carp fish fry.

The results of T5 (ZOM) confirmed the significant gradual (with increasing the feed additive level) improvements in fish performance and feed and nutrients utilization parameters by increasing level of ZOM. These feed additives, also, significantly improved fish carcass composition. So, it could recommend the dietary inclusion of 2 per cent ZOM to common carp fish fry.

The obtained results of T6 (CZM) confirmed the significant gradual (with increasing the feed additive level) improvements in fish performance and feed and nutrients utilization parameters by increasing level of CZM. This feed additive, also, significantly improved fish carcass composition. So, it could recommend the dietary inclusion of 2 per cent CZM to common carp fish fry.

Conclusively, it could recommend the dietary addition of 1 – 2 per cent meals of either chmomilla flowers, majorana leaves, ginger roots, cinnamum park or green tea leaves, respectively, depending on their availability and prices as well as the economics of the production which need more studies.

Introduction

The medical plants are not only used in the ancient nations as folkloric drugs but also in the new world as a return to the nature to avoid the negative side effects of the chemical (pharmaceutical or synthetic) drugs.

Many attempts were carried out to utilize from these plants as appratives or growth promters (El-Saidy and Gaber, 1997; Gaber, 2000; Abd Elmonem et al., 2002 and Abd El-Hakim, 2008) or whether to substitute one of the conventional feed stuffs in a diet or for their attractive or immunostimulatory effects for their constituents'effects (Tawfik et al., 2005).

Mint (Mentha) is a plant shrub genus which contains 13 – 18 species (their origin from europ and Asia), among these is the field ment (Mentha arvensis), it is a permanent green plant which reaches ca. 50 cm length, and produces ca. 25 – 30 kg oil and one ton dried leafes / feddan / year.

According to the American Ministry of Agriculture, each 100 g of mint contain 70 kcal., 0.94 per cent fats, 0.24 per cent saturated fats, 14.89 per cent carbohydrates, 8 per cent fibers, and 3.75 per cent proteins. It is penifet for curing billary disruptions, intestinal coli and stomach gases, besides its effect as tonic. Its inclusion of mantol treats spasms, hepatits, and enflamations. It is used in producing drugs, cosmetics, sweetness, and drinks.

Green (Japanise) tea (Camellia sinensis) is originated from China, India and Silan and introduced to Japan 800 year B.C. It can reduce blood viscosity and cholesterol level (but increase the high density lipo-protein) and act as antioxidant, anti-carcinogen, immuno-stimulant, intestinal motility stimulator, and anti-toxins (anti-food poisoning). It acts against poisoning bacteria and increases beneficial bacteria. Yet, it reduces the absorption of calcium and iron (Anon., 2010).

German matricaria (Matricaria chamomilla) is an annual shrub (5 – 15 cm length), with aromatic flavour, it originates from the Arab world, Europe and Tureyi. Its dried flowers contain 1.5 per cent volatile oil. This oil contains many effective substances as alpha bisabolol, bisabolol oxide A, bisabolol oxide B, β- trans – farnesene, chamaxulene, spathulenol, umbeliferone, herniarin, and flavone glycosides (as apigenin, crysoeriol, luteoline, rutin, quercetin, iserhamntin), as well as hydroxycoumarins (10 per cent). Azulene is the most important component in the oil; it is responsible for the curing effect of Matricaria chamomilla, since it contains unsaturated fatty acids.

Matricaria chamomilla contais tannins, but it is helpsamfull as apperative, anti-fungal, hepatic tonic, gas spiller, anti-colic, sedative, anti-diarhea, immuno-stimulant, and is used in cosmetic soap (Anon., 2013).

Marjoram (Mvajorana hortensis or Origanum majoranum) is originally from the Medditerranean sea basen, it is a permanent green shrub of 50 – 60 cm length, 25 – 30 kg aromatic oil and 2 – 2.5 ton dried leaves / feddan / year. The Egyptian marjoram is a good one, Egypt exports yearly ca. 2000 – 2500 ton of dried marjoram leaves. It is used as food spices, and is used in pharmaceuiticl products for its anti-microbial, anti colic, anti spasm effects; as well as in parfeums and cosmetics production. It is usefull for pituitary gland, liver, colon, and pancreas (Ibrahim, 2013).

Ginger root (Zingiber officinale) contains volatile oil (, China produced 25 per cent of the total world production of ginger year 2005. It is used as tonic, food spices, and hot drinks. It is also benefit for treating liver and kidney disorders, gout, stomach gases, mal-dygestion, colic, vascular disorders, and sexual dysfunction. But it may interact with absorption of iron, fat soluble vitamins and some antibiotics. The Indian ginger is the most usable. Its raw roots are potassium and phosphorus rich (USDA, 2008).

Cinnamum (Cinnamomum zeilanicum Nees or Cinnamomum zeylanicum or Cinnamomum verum) was known for ancient Egyptian. It is a permanent green tree of 10 – 40 m length, originated from south East Asia and South America. Its park contains ca. 40 per cent volatile oils and is rich in magnesium, iron and calcium and contains cinnamaldehyde as antioxidant. It reduces blood cholesterol; so, it is useful for heart and used in treating hernia, inflammations, fatness, diabetic, as well as white candida (Alsaghir, 2010). So, the present work aimed to evaluate some medicinal herbs as feed additives to common carp fry.

Materials and methods

An indoor feeding experiment was conducted with common carp (Syprinus carpio) fry (0.07 – 0.09 g) for 12 weeks to evaluate the dietary inclusion of 1: Mentha arvensis leaves meal (MALM) 2: Camellia sinesis leaves meal (CSLM), 3: Marticaria chmomilla meal (MCM), 4: Origanum majorana leaves meal (MOLM), 5: Zingiber officinale meal (ZOM), and 6: Cinnamum zeylanicum meal (CZM) at 3 levels each, being 0, 1, and 2 per cent of the diet.

A group of common carp fry was obtained from the Fish Nutrition Lab., Baltim Research Station for Aquatic Resources, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt and transported to the wet lab. Fish were maintained in tanks for 2 weeks before the beginning of the experiment for acclimatization purpose. The fish were fed during the acclimatization period on the basal diet (30 per cent crude protein) at a rate of 20 per cent of the body weight daily, at 2 times daily.

The experimental treatments were tested at three tanks (replicates) for each. Fish were stoked at a density of 5 fish / tank. Ground dried leavs (Mentha arvensis, Camellia sinesis, Marticaria chmomilla, and Origanum majorana), roots (Zingiber officinale), and wood (Cinnamum zeylanicum) were added to diets. All feedstuffs used in the experimental diets were purchased from the local market. Composition and chemical analysis of the basal and experimental diets are presented in Table 1 which showed that all the experimental diets were iso-caloric and iso-nitrogenous.

The composition of the vitamins and minerals mixture is presented in Table 2. The evaluation included growth performance, carcass composition and feed utilization. The experimental system consisted of 39 plastic tanks (each of 16 liter water), each tank was continuously supplied with a compressed air from an electric compressor (Shenzehe Company BS410). Dechlorinated tap water was used to change one third of the water in each tank every day. Water was aerated for about 24 hours to remove chlorine before be used.

Table 1: Composition (%) and chemical analysis (% dry matter bases) of the experimental diets.



Table 2: Composition of the vitamins and minerals mixture*(calculated for each kg of the mixture) in the diets.

During the experimental period, the fish were fed the experimental diets at a rate of 20 per cent of the live body weight daily. The diet was introduced twice daily, at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m. The amount of feed was adjusted weekly based on the actual body weight changes. Light was controlled by a timer to provide a 14 h light: 10 h dark as a daily photoperiod. Samples of water from each aquarium were taken to determine water temperature, pH value, and dissolved oxygen concentrations according to Abdelhamid (1996). Water temperature in degree centigrade was recorded every day by using a thermometer. The pH value of water was measured daily using an electric digital pH meter (Jenway Ltd, model 350-pH meter). Dissolved oxygen concentration was determined weekly using an oxygen meter model (d-5509). Determinations of proximate composition of diets and fish body at the start and at the end of the experiment for different groups were carried out according to the methods of A.OA.C. (1990). At the end of the experiment, three fish were derived from each tank for drying at 60ºC for 48 hours and then milled through electrical mill and kept at 4oC until analysis. The growth performance and feed utilization parameters were calculated according to the following equations:

Average weight gain (AWG, g/fish) = Average final weight (g) - Average initial weight (g).

Average daily gain (ADG, mg/fish) = [Average final weight (g)-Average initial weight (g)] 1000 / Time (days).

Survival rate (SR %) = Total number of fish at the end of the experiment × 100 / total number of fish at the start of the experiment.

Relative growth rate (RGR) = Average weight gain (g) / Average initial weight (g).

Specific growth rate (SGR, % / day) = 100 [ln wt1- ln wto/T].

Where: ln: Natural log. Wto: Initial weight (g), Wt1: Final weight (g), and T: Time in days.

Feed conversion ratio (FCR) = Total feed consumption (g) / Weight gain (g).

Protein efficiency ratio (PER) = Body weight gain (g) / protein intake (g).

Protein productive value (PPV %) = 100 [Retained protein (g) / protein intake (g)].

Energy retention (ER %) = 100 [Retained energy (Kcal) / Energy intake (Kcal)].

The data were statistically analyzed using General Linear Models (GLM) procedure adapted by SAS (1996) for user's guide. Means were separated using Duncan's multiple range test (Duncan, 1955).

Results

Water quality parameters measured (temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen) did not differ among treatments (Table 3). Values of the measured criteria were within the normal-suitable ranges for rearing freshwater fish (being 24– 26 ºC, 7.5 – 8.5, and 5 – 6 mg/l, respectively) according to Abdelhamid (2009).

Table 3: Means of some water quality criteria in the experimental fish tanks

Figures 1 – 6 illustrate means of growth performance criteria measured including FW, AWG, ADG, RGR and SGR besides SR by common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels each for 12 weeks. All growth performance parameters [final bodyweight (FBW), average weight gain (AWG) and average daily gain ADG), relative growth rate (RGR) and specific growth rate (SGR)] were significantly (P≤0.05) better on control diet than on the 1st treatment (menthe), particularly at the highest level (2 per cent). Yet, there were no significant (P≥0.05) differences among treatments for survival rates (SR).

The same trend was noticed concerning feed and nutrients utilization (Figs. 7 – 12), since feed intake (FI), feed utilization (FU) efficiency, protein intake (PI), protein productive value (PPV) and energy retention (ER)were more better (P≤0.05) on the control diet than on the treatment No.1 (menthe), particularly at the highest level (2 per cent). Yet, protein efficiency ratio was the lowest (P≤0.05) at 1 per cent menthe-diet comparing with both other diets.

The control diet reflected the highest dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) and the lowest (P≤0.05) ether extract (EE), and ash percentages and lowest (P≤0.05) carcass energy content (EC) in fish body, in comparison with both other diets (Figs. 13 – 17).

Treatment No. 2 (green tea) improved significantly (P≤0.05) FBW, AWG, ADG, RGR and SGR at its both levels (1 and 2 per cent) comparing with control (0 per cent green tea), but did not influence (P≥0.05) SR. Increases (P≤0.05) were noticed in FI, PI and ER at 1 and 2 per cent green tea diets, but improvements were found in FCR and PPV at 2 per cent green tea diet comparing with both other diets, the opposite was true for PER, which was the lowest (P≤0.05) at 2 per cent green tea diet. Best (P≤0.05) DM, EE, ash and EC were given by the control diet, but highest (P≤0.05) CP was obtained in body of fish fed 1 per cent green tea diet.

Marticaria (treatment No.3) at its both levels (1 and 2 per cent) increased significantly (P≤0.05) each of FBW, AWG, ADG, RGR, SGR, FI, PI, and ER, but did not influence significantly (P≥0.05) SR; yet, improved FCR (at 2 per cent marticaria) and worst PER and PPV (particularly at 1 per cent marticaria, P≤0.05) comparing with the control diet. Better (P≤0.05) DM, EE, ash and EC were given in fish body fed the control diet comparing with marticaria diets; yet, marticaria diets offered significantly (P≤0.05) higher CP, particularly at 1 per cent level.

Origanum is the 4th treatment, its both levels significantly (P≤0.05) increased FBW, AWG, ADG, RGR, SGR, FI, PI and ER, but did not significantly (P≥0.05) affect SR. Yet, its 2 per cent level improved significantly (P≤0.05) FCR and PPV. However, it's both levels reduced PER, particularly at 1 per cent level (P≤0.05). It's both levels increased (P≤0.05) each of DM, CP, EE, ash and EC.

Zingiber (treatment No. 5) significantly (P≤0.05) increased each of FBW (particularly the 2nd level (2 per cent)), AWG, ADG, RGR and SGR, FI, PI and ER although did not significantly (P≥0.05) influence SR. Although zingiber significantly (P≤0.05) worst each of FCR, PER and PPV (particularly the 1st level (1 per cent)), it significantly (P≤0.05) increased percentages of the fish body chemical composition (DM, EE, ash and EC).

Ginger (treatment No. 6) at it's both levels increased each of FBW, AWG, ADG, RGR, SGR, FI, feed efficiency (at 1per cent only), PI, PPV and ER without any effect on SR, but PER was reduced at 2 per cent. Proximate analysis (CP, EE, ash and EC) of fish body increased significantly (P≤0.05) by feeding the ginger diets to carp fish.


Fig. 1: Final bodyweight (FW, g / fish) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 2: Average bodyweight gain (AWG, g / fish) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 3: Average daily gain (ADG, mg / fish / day) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 4: Relative growth rate (RGR) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 5: Specific growth rate (SGR) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 6: Survival rate (SR) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 7: Feed intake (FI, g / fish) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 8: Feed conversion ratio (FCR) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 9: Protein intake (PI, g / fish) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 10: Protein efficiency ratio (PER) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 11: Protein productive value (PPV) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 12: Energy retention (ER) of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each.


Fig. 13: Dry matter (DM) percentage of carcass from common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each for 12 weeks.


Fig. 14: Crude protein (CP) percentage of carcass from common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each for 12 weeks.


Fig. 15: Ether extract (EE) percentage of carcass from common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each for 12 weeks.


Fig. 16: Ash percentage of carcass from common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each for 12 weeks.


Fig. 17: Energy content (EC, kcal./100 g) of carcass from common carp fry fed 6 feed additives at 3 levels (0, 1 and 3%) each for 12 weeks.

The comparison among different feed additives used herein reveald no significant (P≥0.05) differences among six treatments in growth performance parameters (Table 4) or feed and nutrients utilization criteria (Table 5). Yet, concerning proximate analysis of fish carcass, ash content only was significantly (P≤0.05) higher in T1 than the other treatments (Table 6).

Table 4: Growth performance parameters of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives for 12 weeks



Table 5: Feed efficiency parameters of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives for 12 weeks



Table 6: Carcass composition of common carp fry fed 6 feed additives for 12 weeks

Discussion

Similar results concerning the positive efffects on growth performance, feed and nutrients utilization and chemical composition were obtained by El-Saidy and Gaber (1997) and Aly et al. (2008) when fed Nile tilapia the garlic meal supplement, Gaber (2000) by feeding Nile tilapia on clove (Eugenia caryophyllata) oil included diets, Abd Elmonem et al. (2002) when fed red tilapia the black seed (Nigella sativa) and roquette seed meals containing diets, Shalaby et al. (2003) who fed Nile tilapia licorice roots (Erksous, Glycycrhiza glabra L.) as feed aditive, Zaki and El-Ebiary (2003) when fed mono-sex Nile tilapia onion (Allium cepa) and garlic (Allium sativum) containing diets, El-Dakar (2004) by feeding hybrid tilapia on diets containing caraway seeds, El-Dakar et al. (2004a) when fed hybrid tilapia the basal leaves diets, El-Dakar et al. (2004b) who fed hybrid tilapia marjoram (Majorana hortensis) leaves included diets, El-Dakar et al. (2004c) who fed Nile tilapia the diets supplemented with fennel (Foenicum vulgare) seed meal, Bakeer and Mostafa (2006) who fed Nile tilapia chamomile flowers supplemented diets, Diab et al. (2006) when fed Nile tilapia echinacea (Echinacea purperea) and marjoram (Origanum marjorana) included diets, and Attalla (2009) by feeding Nile tilapia on ginger (Zingiber officinale) including diets.

Recently, Abdelhamid and Soliman (2012a) added fenugreek seed meal (FSM) or cresson seeds meal (CSM) to Nile tilapia fry diets, they confirmed that FSM had significantly (and proportional to the increase in its addition level) improved the feed utilization in form of protein productive value and energy retention. It improved significantly also (at 2 per cent addition level) fish carcass protein percent. The obtained results for CSM revealed improving effect of this feed additive (particularly at 1 per cent) on fish growth rates (relative and specific) and feed utilization (feed protein intake, protein productive value, protein efficiency ratio, energy retention).

Also, fish carcass ether extract and energy content had increased by this treatment. So, they recommended the dietary addition of 1-2 per cent FSM or CSM to Nile tilapia. Additionally, Abdelhamid and Soliman (2012b) fed Nile tilapia fish fry dietary graded levels of guava tree leaves meal (GTLM) or camphor tree leaves meal (CTLM). The obtained results confirmed the significant gradually (with increasing the feed additive level) improvements in fish final weight, weight gain (total and daily), growth rates (relative and specific), feed utilization (feed and protein intakes, feed conversion, protein productive value, protein efficiency ratio, energy retention) by increasing GTLM or CTLM levels. These feed additives, also, significantly improved fish carcass composition (protein, ether extract, energy content). So, it could recommend the dietary inclusion of 2 per cent GTLM or CTLM to Nile tilapia.

Conclusions

Conclusively, it could recommend the dietary addition of 1 – 2 per cent meals of either chmomilla flowers, majorana leaves, ginger roots, cinnamum park or green tea leaves, respectively, depending on their availability and prices as well as the economics of the production which need more studies.

August 2013

Create an account now to keep reading

It'll only take a second and we'll take you right back to what you were reading. The best part? It's free.

Already have an account? Sign in here