Provisional Fishing Industry Statistics For Scotland

The Fish Site
by The Fish Site
1 June 2010, at 1:00am

SCOTLAND, UK - Despite the value of fish landed in Scotland increasing by 12 per cent in 2009, industry leaders still believe there is much to be done with regard to future regulations on quota and planning.

Bertie Armstrong, chief executive of the Scottish Fishermens Federation outlines his thoughts on the provisional fishing industry statistics published last week.

“The Scottish Government provisional figures for the fishing industry north of the border in 2009 show a 12 per cent increase in value of fish landed by Scottish vessels. This is of course welcomed.

"The breakdown in figures showed that one sector – the midwater or pelagic segment - had a healthy uplift for its mainstay stock of mackerel. In contrast the Scottish langoustine or prawn fleet suffered a correspondingly unhealthy drop of 15 per cent in value. Landing prices are not the whole story, operating costs have to be met and fuel prices also moved up steadily in 2009 from an early low.

“The statistics also show that the number of vessels and people employed in fishing moved down a little, although the generalised figures mask regional differences, with the west coast faring least well compared with the average.

“The most important issue of course is not the history of 2009 but rather how 2010 is unfolding and future prospects, which is an entirely different story.

“For example, the price of fuel continues upward, with the average to date in 2010 being about US$70, compared with around $53 for last year. The Scottish pelagic sector also has to contend with the ridiculously bad behaviour of Iceland, which is over-catching mackerel.

“There is also a real change in fishing opportunity across the two other major sectors of whitefish and Scottish Langoustine. Catching opportunity, in the form of quota and days at sea to catch it, are both reduced for 2010, with the prospect of further reductions in 2011. This amounts to an issue of survival for some fleet sectors and areas, with the west coast particularly hard-pressed.

“There are a number of other important factors at play. Under EU rules, quota overall is to be deliberately moved in a downward direction, with the laudable intention of the ecological health of the various stocks, but the gap between the rules applied and the abundance of stocks found by fishermen on the grounds is wide.

“This must be challenged and we must also move at a pace that ensures industry survival. The Scottish industry has tried as hard as it can to meet management requirements – for example over 150 closed areas were imposed over the course of the year and a serious amount of development work and innovation is being applied to use more selective nets. But we are now nearing, or are at, the limits of what can be achieved by our own initiatives and a reassessment of the plan is an imperative requirement.

“In summary, the increased bottom line evident from the 2009 provisional figures is welcomed, but it is clear that there is a real job to be done in Edinburgh, London and Brussels in planning and regulating for the future. We must remember that the fishing industry supports the sustainable harvesting of a wonderful natural resource. We must not lose that.”