Probiotics as growth promoters in commercial diets

the Fish Site Editor
23 May 2010, at 1:00am

The global aquaculture industry currently accounts for over 45 per cent of all seafood consumed. That figure has been projected to increase to 75 per cent over the next 20 years. Are probiotics necessary to achieve this? Abdel Hamid Eid and K Mohamed from Suaz Canal University, study the effect of using probiotics on tilapia fingerlings.

In Egypt, the production of fish coming from aquaculture represented about 60 per cent of total fish production sources.

This activity requires high-quality feeds, which should contain not only necessary nutrients but also complementary feed additives to keep organism's healthy as well as favour growth and environment-friendly aquaculture. Feed additives are substances with added in trace amounts, which provide a mechanism by which such dietary deficiencies can be addressed which benefits not only the nutrition and thus the growth rate of the animal concerned, but also its health and welfare in modern day fish farming. Some of the most utilised growth-promoting feed additives include hormones, antibiotics, ionospheres and some salts.

Probiotics are also feed additives (Zootechnical additives) which are defined as live microbes that may serve as dietary supplements to improve the host intestinal microbial balance and growth performance. The use of probiotics in aquaculture has been shown to have several benefits: competitive exclusion of pathogenic bacteria through the production of inhibitory compounds; improvement of water quality; enhancement of immune response of host species; and enhancement of nutrition of host species through the production of supplemental digestive enzymes.

Thus, the use of probiotics in aquaculture has received a great deal of attention. Some common strains used as probiotics products include Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. bulgaricus, L.plantariu , Streptococcus lactis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Thus, this study was conducted to determine the effect of using graded levels of probiotics (Biogen®) and Pronifer® on growth performance, feed utilisation, body composition and economic evaluation of feed costs of Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) fingerlings.


Experimental fish

Four hundred and twenty monosex Nile tilapia fingerlings with an average body weight (10g ±0.2g) were obtained from Fish Research Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University. Fish were acclimatised to laboratory conditions for two weeks before being randomly divided into seven equal experimental groups (20 fish each treatment, three replicate/tanks) representing seven nutritional groups. One group served as control and six groups represented the feed additives tested. The experimental fish were weighted every 15 days in order to adjust the daily feed rate which was 3 per cent of the total biomass at three times/ day (8.30, 12.30, and 4.30 pm) for 90 days.

Experimental unit

The present study was conducted in the Fish Research Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University. The experimental fish were stocked in 21 circle fiber glass tanks (380L) supplied with fresh water through a closed recycling system. Tank water was aerated continuously by using an air compressor. Water flow rate was maintained at approximately 1.5L/min. Photoperiod was 12h light/ 12h dark. Water temperature was maintained at (27 ±1oC) by using a 250- watt immersion heater with thermostat. Water temperature and dissolved oxygen were recorded daily (by metteler Toledo, model 128.s/No1242) where the average range of dissolved oxygen was above 5.8 mg/l. Other water quality parameters including pH and ammonia were measured every two days by pH meter (Orion model 720A,s/No 13062) and ammonia meter (Hanna ammonia meter),where the average range of total ammonia was 0.12 - 0.23 mg/l and pH was in range of 7.2 ± 0.5 during the experiment.

Experimental diets

Seven isonitrogenous diets were formulated from practical ingredients (Table1) where the control basal diet was without feed additives and the other diets were supplemented by 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 per cent Biogen® for diets 1, 2 and 3 and 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 per cent Pronifer® for diets 4, 5 and 6, respectively. The experimental diets were formulated to contain almost 25 per cent crude protein. The experimental diets were prepared by individually weighing of each component and by thoroughly mixing the mineral, vitamins and additives with corn. This mixture was added to the components together with oil. Water was added until the mixture became suitable for making granules. The wet mixture was passed through CBM granule machine with 2mm diameter. The produced pellets were dried at room temperature and kept frozen until experimental start.

Table (1): Composition and proximate analysis of the experimental diets

Experimental Diets
Control 1 2 3 4 5 6
Fish meal (60 per cent CP)
10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Corn gluten (60 per cent CP)
12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Soybean meal (44 per cent CP)
22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Wheat bran
18 18 18 18 18 18 18
Yellow corn
29.5 29.4 29.3 29.2 29.4 29.3 29.2
Soy & fish oil
4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Vitamin & Mineral Mix1
3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Di Calcium phosphate
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- 0.1 0.2 0.3 - - -
- - - - 0.1 0.2 0.3
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Chemical composition ( per cent)
. . . . . . .
9.4 9.4 9.6 9.5 9.3 9.9 9.6
Crude protein
25 25.3 25.5 25.8 25.1 25.3 25.4
Ether extract
6.7 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.4 6.6 6.5
Crude fiber
6.6 5.9 6.1 6.8 6.2 6.1 6.2
7 7.1 6.8 6.5 6.8 6.7 6.8
45.3 45.6 45.4 44.7 46.2 45.4 45.5
Gross energy Kcal/ 100g6
390.3 393.2 392.6 392.3 391.7 391.5 391.5
  1. Each Kg vitamin & mineral mixture premix contained Vitamin A, 4.8 million IU, D3, 0.8 million IU; E, 4 g; K, 0.8 g; B1, 0.4 g; Riboflavin, 1.6 g; B6, 0.6 g, B12, 4 mg; Pantothenic acid, 4 g; Nicotinic acid, 8 g; Folic acid, 0.4 g Biotin,20 mg , Mn, 22 g; Zn, 22 g; Fe, 12 g; Cu, 4 g; I, 0.4 g, Selenium, 0.4 g and Co, 4.8 mg.
  2. Each kg Biogen® contained: Allicin 0.247 micromil/gm, high-unit hydrolytic enzyme 3690 units/gm, (proteolytic- lipolytic- amylolytic and cell separating enzymes), Bacillus subtilis Nato 6x 107 cells/gm, Ginseng extract. Manufactured by China Way Corporation 16- 4 No. 424 Chung Ming Road. Taichung Taiwan.
  3. Each kg Pronifer® contained: Viable lactic acid bacteria approx. 106 colony forming units (CFU)/gram, being Lactobacillus plantarum, L. fermentum, L. brvis, L. casei and Pediococcus acidilacticcii), Lactic acid fermentation metabolites and enzymes (organic acid, glucosidase and peptidase enzymes), Free (soluble) amino acids and short-chain peptides (protein predigesting as a result of lactic acid fermentation).Manufactured by P.G.E Company (EGGER), Austria.
  4. Cr2O3: Chromic Oxide
  5. Nitrogen free extract
  6. Gross energy. Based on 5.65 Kcal/g protein, 9.45 Kcal/g fat and 4.1 carbohydrate Kcal/g

Experimental Methodology

The tested diets were analysed for crude protein (CP per cent), ether extract (EE per cent), crude fibre (CF per cent), ash ( per cent) and moisture while whole body composition of fish samples were also analysed except crude fiber (CF per cent) according to the procedures described by standard A.O.A.C. methods. The nitrogen free-extract (NFE per cent) was calculated by differences. Blood sample was collected using heparinized syringes from caudal vein of the experimental fish at the termination of the experiment. Blood was centrifuged at 3000rpm for 5 minutes to allow separation of plasma which was subjected to determination of plasma total protein and plasma albumin. For determination of protein digestibility the diets and faeces were collected during the last 15 days of the experimental period. Any uneaten feed or faeces from each tank was carefully removed by siphoning about 30 min after the last feeding. Faeces were collected by siphoning separately from each replicate tank before feeding in the morning. Collected faeces were then filtered, dried in an oven at 60oC and kept in airtight containers for subsequent chemical analysis.

Statistical analysis

All data were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the general linear models procedure of statistical analysis system (SAS) version 8.02. Duncan's multiple range test was used to resolve differences among treatment means at 5 per cent significant level


Growth performance

The growth performance parameters of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings which fed diets supplemented with either feed additives of (Biogen®) or (Pronifer®) are shown in Table (2). Average of initial body weight of Nile tilapia fingerlings fed the experimental diets at the start did not differ, indicating that groups were homogenous. At the end of the experimental period (90 days), the group of fish fed the supplemented diets grew as well or better than the group of fish fed the control diet. Whereas, the final body weight of the fish groups fed on diets 1, 2 and 3 had significantly (P<0.05) higher final body weight than the rest of the experimental groups. However, the lowest final body weight (72g) was achieved by the group of fish fed the control diet.

Analysis of variance for weight gain followed the same trend as in final body weights. On the other hand, the fish groups fed on diets 1, 2, and 3 had significantly (P<0.05) higher SGR than the rest of experimental groups. However at the end of the trial, SGR values were 2.20 (control diet), 2.42, 2.41, 2.43, 2.22, 2.23 and 2.29 per cent/d for fish groups fed on diets containing 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 per cent (Biogen®) and 0.1,0.2 and 0.3 per cent (Pronifer®), respectively.

These results are in agreement with the results of Mehrim (2001), and Diab, et al. (2002) for tilapia. Khattab et al. (2004) and Mohamed et al. (2007) reported that the Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) fingerlings fed on diets supplemented by probiotics exhibited greater growth than those fed with the control diet. Also, they reported that the diet contain 30 per cent protein supplemented with Biogen® at level of 0.1 per cent produced the best growth performance and feed efficiency, moreover they also reported that Biogen® is an appropriate growth-stimulating additive in tilapia cultivation. Similar results were reported using bacteria as a probiotics by Kozasa (1986) for yellowtail (Seriola lalandei), Gatesoupe (1989 and 1991) and Gatesoupe et al. (1989) for Turbot (Psetta maxima) and Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceu), in addition Carnevali et al. (2006) for sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax, Decamp and Moriarty (2006) for shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei, L. stylirostris and Penaeus monodon) and Yanbo and Zirong (2006) for common carp (Cyprinus carpio). A similar trend was found, in this respect with Noh et al. (1994) and Bogut et al. (1998) who studied the effect of supplementing common carp feeds with different additives, including antibiotics, yeast (S. cerevisiae) and bacteria (S. faecium). They observed better growth with probiotic-supplemented diets but obtained the best growth with the bacterium. It is also necessary, to consider the possibility of interspecies differences with the use of the probiotics. In contrast to these findings Abdelhamid et al. (2002) who found that Biogen® supplementation did not significantly improve growth performance in tilapia fish. In addition, the supplementation of probiotics (Biogen® and Pronifer®) led to 100 per cent Survival rate which shown in Table (2).

Feed Utilisation

Results of feed utilisation in terms of FCR, PER and FE are presented in (Table2). The average of feed conversion ratio (FCR) in fish groups fed on diets 6 and 5 followed by groups of fish fed on diets 3 and 2 were significantly (P<0.05) improved in comparison with the other groups and better than the basal diet. The FCR was found to be 1.75 (control diet), 1.45, 1.44, 1.46, 1.71, 1.66 and 1.61, respectively. These results indicated that the best (P<0.05) FCR values were obtained for group of fish fed on diet 2, 1, 3 , 6 and 5 respectively. The best FCR values observed with probiotics Biogen® supplemented diets suggested that addition of probiotics improved feed utilization. Similar results have been reported for probiotics use in diets for tilapia fingerling by Khattab et al. (2004) and Mohamed et al. (2007).

In practical terms, this means that the use of probiotics can decrease the amount of feed necessary for animal growth which could result in reductions of production cost. The same trend was observed in PER where the fish groups fed on diets 1 and 2 showed better (P<0.05) PER values compared with the other groups. The PER was found to be 2.28 (control diet), 2.72, 2.72, 2.66, 2.33, 2.38 and 2.49,for group of fish fed diets 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 respectively. The protein efficiency ratio results indicate that supplementing diets with probiotics significantly (P<0.05) improved protein utilization in commercial diets of tilapia. Also, the results of feed efficiency followed the same trend of FCR and PER which was found to be 0.69 for group of fish fed diets 1, 2 and 0.68 for group of fish fed diet 3. In the present study, the commercial feed additives (probiotics) used significantly (P<0.05) enhanced feed efficiency. These results are in agreements with the findings of Bomba et al. (2002), Khattab et al. (2004) and Mohamed et al. (2007).

Digestibility Study

Results of apparent protein digestibility are presented in (Table 2) showed that the apparent protein digestibility were improved for tilapia fingerlings fed on the diets supplemented by commercial feed additives compared to group of fish fed the control diet. The better digestibility obtained with the addition of probiotics improved diet and protein digestibility, which may in turn explain the better growth and feed efficiency noticed with the supplemented diets. These results are in conformity with Lara-Flores et al. (2003), De-Schrijver and Ollevier (2006) and Mohamed (2007).

Blood measurements

Results of blood measurements showed no significant differences (P <0.05) in plasma total protein, plasma albumin and plasma total globulins of fish fed the experimental diets in comparison with the control diet. These findings are in agreement with Soliman (2000) and Mohamed (2007) they noted that increasing the Plasma total protein indicates the improvement of the nutritional value of the diet.

Body composition

Table (3) explored that average of whole body composition including crude protein, ether extracts and ash estimated as wet weight basis. No statistical differences were observed in whole body moisture, crude protein, ether extracts and ash. These results are in close agreement with the results of Diab et al. (2002), Lara-Flores et al. (2003) and Mohamed et al. (2007).

Economic evaluation

Calculations of economical efficiency of the tested diets based on the cost of feed, costs of one Kg gain in weight and its ratio with the control group are shown in Table (4). As described in this Table feed costs and cost per kg gain (L.E) were the highest for the control diet (5.74 L.E) and gradually decreased with the increasing levels of feed additives (Biogen® and Pronifer®). The lowest relative percentage of feed cost/ kg fish being to be 85, 87, 88, 98, 96 and 95 for diets 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively. Moreover, the relative percentage of feed cost/ kg gain was found to be 4.59, 4.63, 4.73, 5.38, 5.26 and 5.13 (L.E) for diets 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively. These results indicate that the effect of Biogen® and Pronifer® for improving growth and feed utilisation parameters of mono sex Nile tilapia fingerlings as noted in Table (2). On the other hand, the incorporation of Biogen® in mono sex Nile tilapia fingerlings diets seemed to be economic at incorporation level 0.1 per cent but increasing its level to 0.2 and 0.3 per cent sharply increased feed cost by 4.63 and 4.73 L.E. Moreover the incorporation of Pronifer® at level of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 per cent seemed to be not economic. The reduction of feed costs was easily observed for the feed cost/Kg weight gain which decreased with the increasing incorporation levels of 0.1 per cent Biogen® for mono sex fingerling Nile tilapia diets in agreement with Khattab et al. (2004) and Mohamed et al. (2007).


From the previous results, it could be concluded that the positive influence of additions (Biogen® and Pronifer®) on growth performance of monosex fingerlings Nile tilapia diets showed positive effects. From feed utilization data and the economical point of view the diet supplemented with 0.1 per cent Biogen® was the best treatment.

Table (2): Growth Performance and feed utilization of O. niloticus fingerlings fed the experimental diets

Control 1 2 3 4 5 6
Initial avg. wt. (g)
10.0 10.0 10.2 9.8 9.9 10.1 10.0
final avg. wt. (g)
72.0c 88a 89a 87a 73c 75b 78b
Weight gain (g)
62d 78a 78.8a 77.2a 63.1d 64.9c 68b
SGR per cent/d
2.20b 2.42a 2.41a 2.43a 2.22b 2.23b 2.29b
1.75c 1.45a 1. 44a 1.46a 1.71c 1.66b 1.61b
2.28e 2.72a 2.72a 2.66b 2.33d 2.38d 2.49c
0.57c 0.69a 0.69a 0.68a 0.58c 0.60b 0.62b
Feed intake (g)
108.5 113.1 113.5 112.7 107.9 107.7 109.5
APD ( per cent)
74.3 79.3 79.5 78.5 75.1 76.1 77.3
PTP (g/dl)
4.98 5.11 5.20 5.15 5.01 5.10 5.20
PA (g/dl)
2.06 2.18 2.14 2.17 2.08 2.13 2.13
PTG (g/dl)
2.92 2.93 3.06 2.98 2.93 2.97 3.04
Survival rate (per cent)
95 100 100 100 100 100 100

Value in the same row with a common superscript are not significantly different (P<0.05)

  1. Body weight (BW): fish were weighted every 15 day to the nearest g.
  2. Weight gain (WG) = average final weight (g) - average initial weight (g)
  3. Specific growth rate (SGR) = (Ln. Final body weight- Ln. Initial body weight) x 100/ experimental period (days)
  4. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) = feed intake (g) / body weight gain (g)
  5. Protein efficiency ratio (PER) = weight gain (g) / protein intake (g)
  6. Feed efficiency = (Body weight gain (g)/ feed intake (g)
  7. Apparent protein digestibility. APD (%)
  8. Plasma Total protein. PTP(g/dl)
  9. Plasma albumin. PA(g/dl)
  10. Plasma total globulins= plasma total protein- plasma albumin. PTG (g/dl)
  11. Survival rate =No of survive fish/total No. of fish at the beginning X100


Table (3): Chemical composition of whole body O. niloticus fingerlings fed the experimental diets. (as Wet weight basis)

Chemical composition Initial
Experimental diets
Control 1 2 3 4 5 6
Moisture (per cent)
76.40 71.00a 71.1a 70.98a 71.00a 71.17a 71.12a 71.13a
Crude protein (per cent)
13.55 15.15b 15.26a 15.29a 15.27a 15.22a 15.23a 15.25a
Weight gain (g)
62d 78a 78.8a 77.2a 63.1d 64.9c 68b
Ether extract ( per cent)
4.5 6.17a 6.00a 6.07a 6.09a 6.09a 6.02a 6.01a
Ash (per cent)
5.55 7.68a 7.64a 7.66a 7.64a 7.52a 7.63a 7.61a
*Values in the same row with a common superscript are not significantly different (P< 0.05).

Table (4): Cost of feed required for producing one Kg gain of O. niloticus fingerlings fed the experimental diets.
ITEM (control)
Experimental diets
1 2 3 4 5 6
Cost /kg diet (LE)
3.13 3.17 3.22 3.24 3.15 3.17 3.19
Consumed feed to produce 1kg fish (kg)
1.51 1.28 1.27 1.29 1.47 1.43 1.40
Feed cost per kg fresh fish (LE)
4.72 4.05 4.09 4.18 4.63 4.53 4.47
Relative per cent of feed cost/ kg fish
100 85 87 88 98 96 95
Feed cost /1Kg gain(LE)
5.74 4.59 4.63 4.73 5.13 5. 26 5.13
Relative per cent of feed cost/ kg fish
100 80 81 82 94 92 89


  1. Cost per Kg diet L.E.
  2. Feed intake per fish per period/ final weight per fish Kg/Kg
  3. Step 1X step 2
  4. Respective figures for step 3/ highest figure in this step
  5. Feed intake per Kg gain X step 1
  6. Respective figures for step 5/ highest figure in this step

*Cost of 1 kg ingredients used were 8 L.E for fish meal, 2.25 L.E for soybean meal, 3.50 L.E for corn gluten, 1.50L.E for wheat bran, 1.80 L.E for corn,6.5 L.E for oil, 5L.E for Vit & Min, 45 L.E for Biogen. 20 L.E for Pronifer®

Egypt Feed Ingredients Price at start of 2008.

May 2010